Three-Dimensional Patient-Matched Template Guides Are Able to Increase Mean Diameter and Length and to Improve Accuracy of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws: A 5-Year International Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether significant differences exist between free-hand three-dimensional (3D) planning-guided cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw placement and 3D-printed template-guided CBT screw positioning in terms of accuracy, size of screws, and potential complications. METHODS: In this retrospective study, data of adult patients in whom CBT screws were placed for lumbar degenerative pathologies were extracted from a prospectively collected database and analyzed. Patients in whom screws were placed using free-hand 3D planning-guided technique were compared with patients in whom screws were positioned using customized 3D-printed templates. Size of the screws, accuracy, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The study evaluated 251 patients (1004 screws). The free-hand 3D planning-guided group included 158 patients (632 screws), and the 3D-printed template-guided group included 93 patients (372 screws). The 3D-printed template-guided group involved screws of larger size from L3 to S1. Differences between the 2 groups in terms of accuracy parameters reached statistical significance (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With the use of 3D patient-matched template guides, mean diameter and length of CBT screws could be safely increased due to improved accuracy of screw placement. Based on previous evidence regarding CBT biomechanical properties, these advantages could allow increased fixation strength over traditional convergent pedicle screw trajectories. Further biomechanics studies are needed.

Reduction Capacity and Factors Affecting Slip Reduction Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Introduction: Vertebral slip reduction has been recommended in arthrodesis for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) to achieve balanced spinal alignment and bone fusion. However, what determines the degree of slip reduction using cortical bone trajectory technique for lumbar pedicle screw insertion is yet to be determined. Thus, in this study, we aim to investigate the slip reduction capacity using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique and to identify factors affecting the slip reduction rate. Methods: This is a retrospective radiological evaluation of prospectively collected patients. In total, 49 consecutive patients who underwent single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for LDS using the CBT technique were included (mean follow-up: 28.9 months). Firstly, radiological parameters of fused segment including the percentage of anterior vertebral slip (%slip), lordotic angle, and disk height were measured. Then, patient and procedure-related parameters were examined to determine factors related to the slip reduction rate using multiple regression analysis. Results: The %slip was reduced from 15.0±4.8 to 1.6±2.3% immediately after surgery and 2.2±2.9% at the last follow-up (p<0.01), with a slip reduction rate of 87.5±15.7% and correction loss of 0.6±2.1%. As per multivariate regression analysis, it was found that preoperative %slip (standardized regression coefficient [ß]=-0.55, p=0.003) and the depth of screw insertion in the caudal vertebra (ß=0.38, p=0.03) were significant independent factors affecting slip reduction rate (adjusted R2=0.29, p=0.008). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the capacity for and factors affecting slip reduction using the CBT technique for LDS. The CBT technique may be a useful option for achieving slip reduction, and the depth of screw insertion in the caudal vertebra was identified as a significant technical factor to obtain a more significant reduction of slipped vertebra.

Comparison of Safety and Perioperative Outcomes Between Patient-specific Template-Guided and Fluoroscopic-Assisted Freehand Lumbar Screw Placement Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique.

STUDY DESIGN: Non-randomized prospective controlled study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and perioperative outcomes between patient-specific template-guided and fluoroscopic-assisted freehand techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using cortical bone trajectory (CBT). METHODS: The subjects consisted of 94 consecutive patients who underwent single-level TLIF using CBT. The standard trajectory was set so as to start from the pars interarticularis, pass the inferior border of the pedicle, and end around the middle of the vertebral endplate. Template guide technique was performed in 66 patients (Guide group), and fluoroscopic-assisted freehand technique was performed in 28 patients (Freehand group). Intraoperative parameters, screw placement accuracy, and complications were compared between the two techniques. RESULTS: The Guide group had significantly shorter operative and radiation exposure times than the Freehand group (operative time 84.6 ± 16.7 vs 93.0 ± 15.0 minutes; P = .023, radiation exposure time 7.0 ± 6.0 vs 20.4 ± 11.8 seconds; P < .001, respectively). The screw diameter and the screw insertion depth in the vertebra in the Guide group were significantly greater than those in the Freehand group. The degree and incidence of facet joint violation were comparable between the two groups, while the accuracy of screw placement was significantly different, with no perforation rate of 97.7% in the Guide group vs 82.1% in the Freehand group (P < .001). No significant difference was found in the rate of clinically relevant complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The template-guided technique provided a safe and highly accurate option for CBT screw placement.

Normal pressure hydrocephalus due to an iatrogenic giant lumbar pseudomeningocele after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic pseudomeningocele incidence after lumbar surgery is 0.068%-2%, and most lumbar pseudomeningoceles are smaller than 5 cm; however, in rare cases, "giant" pseudomeningoceles greater than 8 cm in size may develop. Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is another rare condition in which the ventricles expand despite the presence of normal intracranial pressure. To date, pseudomeningocele associated with NPH has not been reported. OBSERVATIONS: An 80-year-old woman underwent L3-5 laminectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and her symptoms improved after surgery. However, dementia appeared 1 month after surgery. Repeated brain computed tomography showed ventricular enlargement, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging showed a long pseudomeningocele in the subcutaneous tissues at the L4 level. Here, the authors report a rare case of an iatrogenic giant pseudomeningocele accompanied by NPH after lumbar surgery. The symptoms of NPH in the present case occurred after spinal surgery and recovered after dural repair surgery, indicating that the changes in cerebrospinal fluid circulation and/or pressure due to pseudomeningoceles may cause NPH. LESSONS: The prevention of dural tears through precise surgical technique and primary repair of dural tears are the best approaches to prevent pseudomeningocele incidence and subsequent events.

Influence of Pedicle Screw Insertion Depth on Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiological Significance of Deeper Screw Placement.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of screw size on achieving bone fusion in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). METHODS: In total, 137 consecutive patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level PLIF at L4-L5 were evaluated. Factors investigated for their contribution to bone fusion included: 1) age, 2) sex, 3) body mass index, 4) bone mineral density, 5) intervertebral mobility, 6) screw diameter, 7) screw length, 8) screw fitness in the pedicle (%fill), 9) screw depth in the vertebra (%depth), 10) screw angle, 11) facetectomy, 12) crosslink connector, and 13) cage material. RESULTS: Bone fusion was confirmed in 88.2% of patients. The comparison between fusion (+) and fusion (-) groups showed no significant differences in screw size. The %fill and %length were significantly greater in the fusion (+) group than in the fusion (-) group (%fill: 58.5% ± 7.5% vs 52.3% ± 7.3%, respectively, P = .005; %depth: 59.8% ± 9.7% vs 50.3% ± 13.8%, respectively, P = .025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that %fill (odds ratio [OR]= 1.11, P = .025) and %depth (OR = 1.09, P = .003) were significant independent factors affecting bone fusion. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses identified a %fill of 60.0% and a %depth of 54.2% as optimal cutoff values for achieving bone fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Screw size should be determined based on the screw fitness in the pedicle (%fill > 60%) and screw insertion depth in the vertebral body (%depth > 54.2%) according to individual vertebral anatomy in L4-L5 PLIF.

Radiological comparison of penetrating endplate trajectory versus anterior bicortical trajectory for sacral pedicle screw insertion in posterior lumbosacral interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND: The bicortical or tricortical fixation technique with purchase into the anterior sacral wall or promontory has been recommended to achieve rigid sacral pedicle screw fixation, which carries the potential risk of neurovascular injuries. The penetrating endplate screw (PES) technique was proposed as an alternative screw trajectory to facilitate both strong fixation and safety. However, there has been no report on the practical significance of using the PES technique. The aim of the present study was to investigate radiological outcomes using the PES technique for lumbosacral fusion by comparing it with the anterior bicortical technique. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 44 patients with L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S using the PES technique (20 patients) or the anterior bicortical technique (24 patients) and were followed up for > 2 years (mean follow-up: 36.6 months). Screw loosening and bone fusion were radiologically assessed and compared between the two groups. Factors contributing to bone fusion were investigated using the following factors: (1) age, (2) sex, (3) body mass index, (4) bone mineral density, (5) screw diameter, (6) screw length, (7) pelvic incidence, (8) crosslink connector, (9) cage material, and (10) sacral screw insertion technique. RESULTS: Respective screw loosening and bone fusion rates were 10.0 and 90.0% using the PES technique and 29.2 and 79.2% using the anterior bicortical technique, with no significant differences between the two techniques. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the age (odds ratio = 0.87, p = 0.02) and PES technique (odds ratio = 22.39, p = 0.02) were significant independent factors contributing to bone fusion. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the significance of using the PES technique to improve radiological outcomes. The PES technique could be a valid option for lumbosacral fixation for L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis in terms of improved bone fusion.

Novel Technique for Sacral-Alar-Iliac Screw Placement Using Three-Dimensional Patient-Specific Template Guide.

INTRODUCTION: The sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screw technique is becoming popular for sacropelvic fixation. However, appropriately placing SAI screws is technically demanding because of a narrow safe corridor and the risk of neurovascular/visceral injuries. Recently, a three-dimensional patient-specific template guiding technique for pedicle screw placement has been considered a promising method to improve accuracy and safety. The objective of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of SAI screw placement with a patient-specific template guide using cadaveric and prospective clinical pilot studies. METHODS: Three-dimensional planning of SAI screw placement, including entry point, screw trajectory, length, and diameter, was performed using a computer simulation software. Then, three-dimensional printed patient-specific template guides were created based on the plan. Firstly, a total of 12 SAI screws were placed for 6 cadaveric specimens using the guides. Next, in a prospective clinical trial, a total of 20 SAI screws were placed for 10 consecutively enrolled patients. The safety and accuracy of screw placement were analyzed using postoperative computed tomography by the evaluation of any cortical breach and measurement of screw deviations between the planned and actual screw positions. RESULTS: All the screws showed no perforation. In the cadaveric study, the mean horizontal and vertical deviations from the planned screw position at the entry point were 1.40±1.21 mm and 1.34±1.09 mm, respectively. The mean angular deviations in the sagittal and transverse planes were 1.68°±1.24° and 1.53°±1.06°, respectively. The results of the clinical study showed comparable accuracy with those of the cadaveric study, except for the vertical deviation at the entry point (p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using a patient-specific template guide for SAI screw placement. This technique could become an effective solution to achieve accurate screw placement.

Depth of vertebral screw insertion using a cortical bone trajectory technique in lumbar spinal fusion: radiological significance of a long cortical bone trajectory.

OBJECTIVE: Contrary to original cortical bone trajectory (CBT), "long CBT" directed more anteriorly in the vertebral body has recently been recommended because of improved screw fixation and load sharing within the vertebra. However, to the authors' knowledge there has been no report on the clinical significance of the screw length and screw insertion depth used with the long CBT technique. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of the screw insertion depth in the vertebra on lumbar spinal fusion using the CBT technique. METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5 using the CBT technique were included (mean follow-up 32.9 months). Screw loosening and bone fusion were radiologically assessed to clarify the factors contributing to these outcomes. Investigated factors were as follows: 1) age, 2) sex, 3) body mass index, 4) bone mineral density, 5) intervertebral mobility, 6) screw diameter, 7) screw length, 8) depth of the screw in the vertebral body (%depth), 9) facetectomy, 10) crosslink connector, and 11) cage material. RESULTS: The incidence of screw loosening was 3.1% and bone fusion was achieved in 91.7% of patients. There was no significant factor affecting screw loosening. The %depth in the group with bone fusion [fusion (+)] was significantly higher than that in the group without bone fusion [fusion (-)] (50.3% ± 8.2% vs 37.0% ± 9.5%, respectively; p = 0.001), and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that %depth was a significant independent predictor of bone fusion. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified %depth > 39.2% as a predictor of bone fusion (sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 75.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study is, to the authors' knowledge, the first to investigate the significance of the screw insertion depth using the CBT technique. The cutoff value of the screw insertion depth in the vertebral body for achieving bone fusion was 39.2%.

Is a cross-connector beneficial for single level traditional or cortical bone trajectory pedicle screw instrumentation?

The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has been introduced with the aim of better screw hold, however, screw-rod constructs with this trajectory might provide less rigidity in lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) compared to the constructs with the traditional trajectory (TT). Therefore, the addition of a horizontal cross-connector could be beneficial in counteracting this possible inferiority. The aim of this study was to compare the primary rigidity of TT with CBT screw-rod constructs and to quantify the effect of cross-connector-augmentation in both. Spines of four human cadavers (T9 -L5) were cropped into 15 functional spine units (FSU). Eight FSUs were instrumented with TT and seven FSUs with CBT pedicle screws. The segments were tested in six loading directions in three configurations: uninstrumented, instrumented with and without cross-connector. The motion between the cranial and caudal vertebra was recorded. The range of motion (ROM) between the CBT and the TT group did not differ significantly in either configuration. Cross-connector -augmentation did reduce the ROM in AR (16.3%, 0.27°, p = 0.02), LB (2.9%, 0.07°, p = 0.03) and flexion-extension FE (2.3%, 0.04°, p = 0.02) for the TT group and in AR (20.6%, 0.31°, p = 0.01) for the CBT-group. The primary rigidity of TT and CBT single level screw-rod constructs did not show significant difference. The minimal reduction of ROM due to cross-connector-augmentation seems clinically not relevant. Based on the findings of these study there is no increased necessity to use a cross-connector in a CBT-construct.

Treatment of Thoracolumbar Spinal Fracture Accompanied by Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis Using Transdiscal Screws for Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: Preliminary Results.

STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective case series enrolled 13 patients who underwent posterior fixation with both transdiscal screws for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (TSDs) and pedicle screws (PSs) to treat spinal injury accompanied by diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). PURPOSE: To describe the usefulness, feasibility, and biomechanics of TSD. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Vertebral bodies accompanied by DISH generally have lower bone mineral density than normal vertebral bodies because of the stress shielding effect. This phenomenon tends to makes screw fixation challenging. To our knowledge, solutions for this issue have not previously been reported. METHODS: Patients were assessed using the data on surgical time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, mean number of stabilized intervertebral segments, number of screws used, perioperative complications, union rate, and the three-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ5D-3L) score at the final follow-up. The Hounsfield unit (HU) values of the screw trajectory area, and the actual intraoperative screw insertion torque of TSDs and PSs were also analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The surgical time and estimated intraoperative blood loss were 165.9±45.5 minutes and 71.0±53.4 mL, respectively. The mean number of stabilized intervertebral segments was 4.6±1.0. The number of screws used was 4.9±1.3 for TSDs and 3.0±1.4 for PSs. One death occurred after surgery. The union rate and EQ5D-3L scores were 100% and 0.608±0.128, respectively. The HU value and actual intraoperative screw insertion torque of TSDs were significantly better than those of PSs (p<0.001, p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: We were able to achieve stable surgical outcomes using the combination of TSDs and PSs. The HU value and actual intraoperative screw insertion torque were significantly higher for TSDs than for PSs. Based on these results, when treating thoracolumbar spinal fractures accompanied by DISH in elderly populations, the TSD could be a stronger anchor than the PS.

Impact of Screw Diameter and Length on Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Finite Element Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study. PURPOSE: To quantitatively investigate the effect of screw size on screw fixation in osteoporotic vertebrae with finite element analysis (FEA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Osteoporosis poses a challenge in spinal instrumentation; however, the selection of screw size is directly related to fixation and is closely dependent on each surgeon's experience and preference. METHODS: Total 1,200 nonlinear FEA with various screw diameters (4.5-7.5 mm) and lengths (30-50 mm) were performed on 25 patients (seven men and 18 women; mean age, 75.2±10.8 years) with osteoporosis. The axial pullout strength, and the vertebral fixation strength of a paired-screw construct against flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were examined. Thereafter, we calculated the equivalent stress of the bone-screw interface during nondestructive loading. Then, using diameter parameters (screw diameter or screw fitness in the pedicle [%fill]), and length parameters (screw length or screw depth in the vertebral body [%length]), multiple regression analyses were performed in order to evaluate the factors affecting various fixations. RESULTS: Larger diameter and longer screws significantly increased the pullout strength and vertebral fixation strength; further, they decreased the equivalent stress around the screws. Multiple regression analyses showed that the actual screw diameter and %length were factors that had a stronger effect on the fixation strength than %fill and the actual screw length. Screw diameter had a greater effect on the resistance to screw pullout and flexion and extension loading (ß =0.38-0.43, p <0.01); while the %length had a greater effect on resistance to lateral bending and axial rotation loading (ß =0.25-0.36, p <0.01) as well as mechanical stress of the bone-screw interface (ß =-0.42, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The screw size should be determined based on the biomechanical behavior of the screws, type of mechanical force applied on the corresponding vertebra, and anatomical limitations.

Smart glasses display device for fluoroscopically guided minimally invasive spinal instrumentation surgery: a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVE: Most surgeons are forced to turn their heads away from the surgical field to see various intraoperative support monitors. These movements may result in inconvenience to surgeons and lead to technical difficulties and potential errors. Wearable devices that can be attached to smart glasses or any glasses are novel visualization tools providing an alternative screen in front of the user's eyes, allowing surgeons to keep their attention focused on the operative task without taking their eyes off the surgical field. The aim of the present study was to examine the feasibility of using glasses equipped with a wearable display device that transmits display monitor data during fluoroscopically guided minimally invasive spinal instrumentation surgery. METHODS: In this pilot prospective randomized study, 20 consecutively enrolled patients who underwent single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) at L5-S1 performed using the percutaneous pedicle screw technique were randomly divided into two groups, a group for which the surgeon used a wearable display device attached to regular glasses while performing surgery (smart glasses group) and a group for which the surgeon did not use such a device (nonglasses group). Real-time intraoperative fluoroscopic images were wirelessly transmitted to the display device attached to the surgeon's glasses. The number of head turns performed by the surgeon to view the standard fluoroscopic monitor during procedures and the operative time, estimated blood loss, radiation exposure time, screw placement accuracy, and intraoperative complication rate were evaluated for comparison between the two groups. RESULTS: The number of surgeon head turns to view the fluoroscopic monitor in the smart glasses group was 0.10 ± 0.31 times, which was significantly fewer than the head turns in the nonglasses group (82.4 ± 32.5 times; p < 0.001). The operative and radiation exposure times in the smart glasses group were shorter than those in the nonglasses group (operative time 100.2 ± 10.4 vs 105.5 ± 14.6 minutes, radiation exposure time 38.6 ± 6.6 vs 41.8 ± 16.1 seconds, respectively), although the differences were not significant. Postoperative CT showed one screw perforation in the nonglasses group, and no intraoperative complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This is, to the authors' knowledge, the first report on the feasibility of using this wearable display device attached to glasses for fluoroscopically guided minimally invasive spinal instrumentation surgery. Smart glasses display devices such as this one may be a valid option to facilitate better concentration on operative tasks by improving ergonomic efficiency during surgery.

Results of Using a Novel Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Technique for Patients with Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis-The Single or Double Endplates Penetrating Screw (SEPS/DEPS) Technique.

INTRODUCTION: We have developed the single or double endplates penetrating screw (SEPS/DEPS) technique, which is a novel percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion technique suitable for osteoporotic vertebral body fracture (OVF) patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). This study aims to compare the effectiveness of this SEPS/DEPS technique with the conventional pedicle screw technique. METHODS: The screw is inserted upward from the outer caudal side of the pedicle toward the inner cranial side. Vertebrae affected with DISH were inserted with screws using the SEPS/DEPS technique, whereas non-fused vertebrae were inserted with screws using the conventional PPS technique. Twelve OVF patients with DISH were included in this study; three with SEPS/DEPS technique only and nine with a hybrid of both the DEPS and the conventional PPS techniques. As a control group, 12 OVF patients with DISH treated by conventional PPS. The rates of implant failures and of surgical complications were compared between the SEPS/DEPS group and the control group. The insertion torque was measured and compared between DEPS and conventional PPS in three hybrid patients. RESULTS: In the SEPS/DEPS group, 70 screws were inserted with the SEPS/DEPS technique and 56 screws were inserted with the conventional PPS technique. In the control group, 116 screws were inserted using the conventional PPS and the PS techniques. The loosening of screws was significantly less in screws inserted with the SEPS/DEPS technique (0/70 screws, 0%) than with screws inserted with the conventional technique (12/116 screws, 10.3%). The average insertion torque of DEPS was 2.25 Nm, which was 134% higher than that of conventional PPS which was 1.64 Nm (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This novel SEPS/DEPS technique has a higher insertion torque compared with the conventional PPS techniques and demonstrated itself to be an effective option for patients with concomitant bone fragility due to DISH.

Combination of sacral-alar-iliac screw and cortical bone trajectory screw techniques for lumbosacral fixation: technical note.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbosacral fixation plays an important role in the management of devastating spinal pathologies, including osteoporosis, fracture, infection, tumor resection, and spinal deformities, which require long-segment fusion constructs to the sacrum. The sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screw technique has been developed as a promising solution to facilitate both minimal invasiveness and strong fixation. The rationale for SAI screw insertion is a medialized entry point away from the ilium and in line with cranial screws. The divergent screw path of the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) provides a higher amount of cortical bone purchase and strong screw fixation and has the potential to harmoniously align with SAI screws due to its medial starting point. However, there has been no report on the combination of these two techniques. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of this combination technique. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 17 consecutive patients with a mean age of 74.2 ± 4.7 years who underwent posterior lumbosacral fixation for degenerative spinal pathologies using the combination of SAI and CBT fixation techniques. There were 8 patients with degenerative scoliosis, 7 with degenerative kyphosis, 1 with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture at L5, and 1 with vertebral metastasis at L5. Fusion zones included T10-sacrum in 13 patients, L2-sacrum in 2, and L4-sacrum in 2. RESULTS: No patients required complicated rod bending or the use of a connector for rod assembly in the lumbosacral region. Postoperative CT performed within a week after surgery showed that all lumbosacral screws were in correct positions and there was no incidence of neurovascular injuries. The lumbosacral bone fusion was confirmed in 81.8% of patients at 1-year follow-up based on fine-cut CT scanning. No patient showed a significant loss of spinal alignment or rod fracture in the lumbosacral transitional region. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first paper on the feasibility of a combination technique using SAI and CBT screws. This technique could be a valid option for lumbosacral fixation due to the ease of rod placement with potential reductions in operative time and blood loss.

Accuracy of cortical bone trajectory screw placement using patient-specific template guide system.

Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) can facilitate both minimum invasiveness and strong screw fixation; however, ensuring the ideal cortical trajectory is challenging due to the narrow corridor, necessitating high-level surgical skill. A patient-specific template guide for CBT screw placement may be a promising solution to improve accuracy and safety. Little has been reported on the use of a CBT screw guide in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of CBT screw placement using the template guide. This study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of prospectively collected patients. Forty-three consecutively enrolled patients who underwent posterior lumbar spinal fusion using the guide system were included. First, three-dimensional planning of CBT screw placement was performed using computer simulation software. The trajectory was directed in a more anterior position of the vertebral body, compared with the original CBT, and the standard size was set as 5-6 mm in diameter and 40-45 mm in length. Then, screw guides were created for each vertebra preoperatively and used. The safety and accuracy of a total of 198 inserted screws (L1 to L5) were analyzed using postoperative computed tomography by evaluation of pedicle perforation and measurement of screw deviations between the planned and actual screw positions. A total of 193 screws (97.5%) were placed completely inside the pedicle and there was no incidence of neurovascular injuries. The mean screw deviation from the planned trajectory on the coronal plane at the midpoint of the pedicle was 0.62 ± 0.42 mm, and the mean angular deviations in the sagittal and transverse planes were 1.68 ± 1.24° and 1.27 ± 0.77°, respectively. CBT screw placement using a patient-specific template guide was accurate enough for clinical application. This technique could be an effective solution to achieve both correct screw insertion and a reduction of complications.

Feasibility of using tapping torque during lumbar pedicle screw insertion to predict screw fixation strength.

BACKGROUND: Rigid pedicle screw fixation is mandatory for achieving successful spinal fusion; however, there is no reliable method predicting screw fixation before screw insertion. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of measurement of tapping torque to predict pedicle screw fixation. METHODS: First, different densities of polyurethane foam were used to measure tapping torque. The insertional torque during pedicle screw insertion and axial pullout strength were measured and compared between under-tapped and same-tapped groups. Next, for in vivo study, the tapping and insertional torque of lumbar pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory technique were measured intraoperatively in 45 consecutive patients. Then, correlations between tapping torque, the bone mineral density of the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae, and insertional torque were investigated. RESULTS: Ex vivo tapping torque significantly correlated with the insertional torque and pullout strength regardless of tapping sizes (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). The mean in vivo tapping and insertional torque were 1.48 ± 0.73 and 2.48 ± 1.25 Nm, respectively (p < 0.001). Insertional torque significantly correlated with tapping torque and two BMD parameters, and the correlation coefficient of tapping torque (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) was higher than those of femoral neck BMD (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) and lumbar BMD (r = 0.39, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tapping torque is a reliable predictor of pedicle screw fixation and allows surgeons to improve the integrity of the bone-screw interface by making modification prior to actual screw insertion.

Factors important in bone union after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the cortical bone trajectory technique.

BACKGROUND: The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique has developed as an alternative to the traditional pedicle screw fixation technique due to its minimum invasiveness for screw insertion and rigid fixation for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, the factors contributing to bone union after CBT-PLIF is a controversial subject. The aim of this study was to investigate factors important to bone union after CBT-PLIF. METHODS: We analyzed 69 consecutive patients who underwent single-level CBT-PLIF from October 2011 to December 2016 and were followed for over two years. Bone union was evaluated using computed tomography (CT) and dynamic assessment in the radiograph within two years after CBT-PLIF. The following factors that may influence bone union were investigated: age, gender, bone mineral density (BMD), cage materials [polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) or titanium (Ti)], vertebral-slip (neutral), translational motion (flexion/extension), angular motion (flexion/extension), screw depth into the vertebral body (% depth), interval of bilateral screw heads, and cage position. RESULTS: The bone union rate at the two-year follow-up was 88.4% (61/69). A univariate analysis revealed that variables with values of P<0.20 were age (P<0.01), gender (P=0.07), cage material (P=0.18), vertebral slip (neutral) (P=0.14), % depth (P=0.086), and cage position (P<0.01). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that factors related to bone union were young age (P<0.01), Ti cage (P<0.01), small vertebral slip (neutral) (P<0.01), high % depth (P<0.01), and anterior cage position (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: For CBT-PLIF, deeper screw insertion into the vertebral body, anterior cage placement, and Ti cage usage may be important surgical techniques to achieve a successful bone union.

Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement Accuracy with a Patient-Matched 3-Dimensional Printed Guide in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw is an attractive technique in terms of fixation strength and less invasiveness. However, the insertion of a pedicle screw penetrating cortical bone on the ideal trajectory is technically demanding. The use of 3-dimensional (3D) patient-matched guides may facilitate the use of this technique. In this technical note and case series, the use of a patient-matched 3D targeting guide for a circumferential fixation with CBT screws is described. METHODS: Eleven patients with a mean age of 49 years were treated. The MySpine MC (Medacta International SA, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) technology was used to place CBT screws. A computed tomography (CT) scan-derived 3D model of the patient vertebra was created after the surgeons planned the best custom CBT screw trajectory. Then, scaffolds were printed and used during surgery to guide the screw through the patient pedicle. An intersomatic arthrodesis was also performed. RESULTS: The images of the planned trajectory were superimposed on the postoperative CT scan, confirming the accuracy of the trajectory. The mean deviation from the planned pedicle midpoint was 0.91 mm; 85.2% of the screws were placed within 2° from the planned trajectory. There were 2 grade A (<2 mm) and no grade B or C perforations. The actual entry point was always within 2 mm from the planned entry point. CONCLUSIONS: This technical note and case series is the first clinical description on the use of a patient-matched guide for posterior CBT screw placement. The use of these devices could also improve placement accuracy and decrease the risk of nerve damage.